 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 + R4 i% [/ X( ` W9 Q$ u2 `
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!( C N) ~% M, D$ u9 g% u. C3 t
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
0 C8 [5 _5 @+ W5 f3 ?& \
' l6 [2 l7 `" G% q& j4 i/ ^您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。' I- I6 {! Q1 D0 q6 v
2 w" j, A( s1 K$ F$ ^8 ]* e1 W安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless., T O9 p: N$ D$ T% E( Q- R5 f0 b7 e
2 n% b- O) [9 h% t# i7 Z+ ~0 k不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?6 g& |7 G; t& h. M# R
% v+ d. ]9 G3 H$ {; B I7 X另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
6 H( f2 p+ }+ s& p* W: r$ x5 u# ]: `' k( q
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):" e% c* w4 Y) C" }' }6 I
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
& T$ B% W9 c1 F: S4 G
% ]- O1 [0 l: d# l5 w& f v, W! jOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".$ ` F( @% K R0 t2 A+ k
/ ^! O' a) h6 G% G& T7 e" VBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
' q% ^7 z1 Q7 I! y E1 q$ M- s6 v. p6 k
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|