 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 : @0 u* P, g3 ?) u6 D
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!9 E* \0 o) A2 r6 I N
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 0 J4 ~3 O+ v3 P9 l& y
W: W( R5 b- H1 J您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
9 T- l, l' n3 W% L. ^" D6 { M, Q7 h; l" e5 x
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.8 @' f' d# ` w, c) O9 W
- w' b9 \6 A2 C不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
: Z/ n2 |% y. l! u0 }
- _" ?/ `, p! b另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
; Z- c7 C. |9 h0 {) x' ]# c6 p7 ]8 s1 A; B2 T
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):7 B$ ^' C# l$ s5 h% C4 L$ R, w
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 O5 f5 I k/ ?! N0 M8 x! G: ]; p5 D( x) A! Q0 T8 [
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
5 o" j4 G6 ^. D7 A3 y
, Y+ p5 m. S l6 j) M" xBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
0 ?5 ^8 O' d/ i6 `* M: S z/ @$ Z- n5 @4 B$ @$ W3 Q, O3 N0 i2 E
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|