 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
' p. |; a3 o! T5 d: T楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!1 V5 F V8 a) L H
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 m* b5 }; s; W1 ~2 K) B2 c' I6 x) ?3 t) q$ h
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
& I% o2 t. ^4 A" x* W/ ~4 j* d) z, l9 H B& r7 |% ^# }2 P
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.+ v0 W- x$ P8 F! i! g. Z5 o
, ~( a, `2 K/ Z不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
/ S' w, a6 W+ }, }7 C
% q) x/ k) k/ y) ?4 Z另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
% ?5 N* x* u$ C8 p& P9 D
4 C2 w; p' p7 h" v关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
7 k4 p# b, z5 |: mYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.- d2 ~: z; h3 F- D) |% |
+ T1 L# q" a5 l- M) m3 I0 N ?' a6 M
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
- H) u3 F5 u# D( o; ?2 I
- i. x$ y: q- J( R) ?* ~, oBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.0 k5 I- l" j$ S: n
' k1 V) ~, b* e" K% D2 c9 s/ @9 ?! w+ J
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|