 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 & }% |5 ]4 |" s2 _9 z( Z4 w L v
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
0 X% X. o- n' Q. y: Tcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
% k! o" Q) [+ f* ?* q$ ?" S5 g/ p/ t! U: y, N5 U+ x: ]" V0 p
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
- R! j" h/ ], L4 ] ^2 y: ~; b5 x p4 U' F" @7 }! X6 h
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
U3 L- K6 \, b9 t' k, B' N
1 ?- ~/ C/ y% V7 k O6 {! c2 M+ ~( e不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?! a" h8 L- n( S7 P+ |7 [$ t _# z
5 \# i' R( v2 u& y) z, L另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
6 @9 T" R3 t" T
, E9 e9 [% g' ?# v: t关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
- O9 [9 r- N: l I/ P* U9 X7 vYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 B% y% ]6 p9 @ M- R
! m6 r0 m7 ]7 {% l3 UOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".7 N" y2 o v3 A* K; V1 b
4 z4 r3 ?. O# D- \" L ZBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
: }- |9 j; D0 T# D/ b0 h# M2 N
; q+ C6 L" H" x6 K8 y7 A% M[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|