 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
( X( T* M) ]$ c* P) S1 H7 F- n楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 ?+ ~4 ~2 _8 u0 T K$ i5 m# n
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
, A# F. c+ U$ J3 g7 _ O1 B1 ^! d, D) I: p! g6 ~
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
) z* h! {: p0 n; F/ L6 R
; z9 X& g+ l9 V4 F安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
3 L6 o- Y8 d, j3 ]- B
' z+ ?5 U3 Y- u3 H- I! m- r不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?$ K7 p2 {& l1 J( r1 z
4 } q* L9 t$ x4 ]: }& h另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
2 x* j9 g: _8 t
' f9 d2 W# I3 P关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):. O5 ?& O7 D+ d
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers., u) |( m/ s8 b1 v
* ?+ C# C9 ~- v4 Y( k0 ^# KOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".' ?8 b p" Z3 H% w- ]
1 d; c1 F( ?3 L& `, ?But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
+ v4 Y: I- n; c6 R; v9 O
6 m! c7 _1 r6 K. i3 }& W[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|