 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
2 f4 D2 e/ y7 h$ D楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!: }( C0 y% ]# X" J ^
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... Y' Q+ Z/ G9 c6 t! ?" _) g
% Z5 X! @3 y- W; Q# J5 f
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。# }. O2 a# X, k6 Q3 b2 b, N3 H
: X+ t* e+ \" n8 G' U2 I
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
2 \9 [* ~& b& N- x1 C& |
4 x0 {$ ~1 _" O9 \# i不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?* s% T, [ I/ O+ A4 Y& T( I4 p% H
. ~2 U# `- ~7 S @) [
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
3 N y# _' P0 }. ?0 F: X" Y" N8 h" @1 M+ a
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):# i% j" T$ V$ ?/ m( a
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.7 B$ O2 Y; U$ B/ W, o( D& n5 Z: Q
- d2 _* y3 j) W/ m5 nOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
- l2 a6 O' G* E3 B3 p* g
! X0 y8 n3 Z3 X: U! G; d- ?But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.$ y% F* `) j' n( b) \
3 S/ f4 d( W1 T$ ^0 W[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|