 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ' i7 ?: u$ b4 s
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
( [ r0 L% q0 A) {1 v" Ncorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
; |% W1 z1 C# b6 F. l* `
) g S( a+ P, O您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。2 C0 o& d; i% N4 N
/ K0 G4 a1 B- W安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
+ F! C/ I! C8 B3 I; Z7 G* Y" p; n8 |6 Z- J+ ~4 Y/ a
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?+ b6 W5 J' K5 H. c" m* `: q
( v$ Q5 h- f5 Y1 y另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。1 S) M3 i7 e7 q( Z5 f
; s: ]# [0 X3 s* w3 q1 t关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
. m8 \6 l- E0 L! S# YYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
9 I1 }+ q' m* f0 r& v5 l
" ]2 S' n9 v! f- T5 kOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"., b3 c7 K! A$ {, S
. O! B0 D8 M" j& ^, s- _
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
5 D2 s, j& g: @1 @4 u3 y, L9 p0 _& h9 p4 g/ d8 Y2 R
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|