 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
4 _# O* A; i+ M j! _ x6 `楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!- Y; r) m3 }0 u( P1 A
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
/ Y# P8 \+ Y. J! V3 J1 X/ S7 E9 z) f0 _
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。6 o( d# a6 Z1 |, _3 D
% J/ I; m9 ^: w# o# r7 J) ^; w
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.6 v6 t! F [9 v3 u) R5 B
/ Z' X8 y3 ~' b4 ]4 i不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
! Z8 G% B& {- y& e3 ]1 i, ]( w5 P' t2 b: `
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
. T; F; D% v4 n" }; ?) A& v0 b
5 g! B5 p( C; j# q0 t5 U关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):# W" w. O1 d" ]! k
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
8 s. Q9 m T! C7 ^2 @: a! n- l5 e! X7 u5 r8 x( I
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".2 A( G" o! U2 o) d9 ?2 f3 U6 l: P
6 f6 [4 t8 L9 f! E( ABut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.9 |* B1 G8 ~( u( V" C1 n: }3 K
" C9 @ I0 h- F) X# s7 N: t* g[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|