埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1844|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: - {& f1 Z" \$ O+ y  K9 H  m
+ Q- c  m3 z/ M
Despite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat
1 j6 h4 W0 U! g( x0 h! m" K; U    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US
  k7 U7 T) U- H$ b8 ?+ bcommercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern
0 `& ]5 g, F, }1 z7 oas the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging
2 v: F( w8 j3 q; t2 o$ oTrends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
( z6 R# n9 i4 G: q, u3 Yand the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more; `1 m; r- \( L& G7 v8 s/ s
upbeat.$ l4 N3 N) A7 \) M* ]& d
    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded4 S( v: D" p1 g8 r5 T% N+ [8 ]5 g/ d
annual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects9 q8 d' z' ^  ?: A7 p$ }! o
interviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real
% T  M4 o" f  \# Pestate experts, including investors, developers, property company
  Z3 g  J! j; ^% m# yrepresentatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.
! h5 l/ w1 {4 vOther versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world
, B3 t/ ?  ^7 n+ R' u. {( F; qincluding Asia Pacific and Europe.
+ f0 P8 @  ~) w9 M/ j    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian
' E3 q, x  v1 L! y* {- I1 QReal Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment$ @9 i. A3 ~; m8 N7 Q0 a
environment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to* w; u: G$ l/ F' }
be avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record
' h9 B( a% U  r( W  ]% ]2 Lhighs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."
6 ?  G9 z+ l7 m- K    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the
7 W' p$ a" X) Z1 K5 ?8 K3 d+ Pborder will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game
% a$ W) W3 _9 I. `! qspeculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey
* S+ O. t1 x' ^( v3 ?# premain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US
% |! q9 _2 d( Y( S4 I3 L. l3 ecorrection. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be: s/ k& y7 ^( d/ B. [7 @' C
very good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent., ]. n4 n+ N6 p" |0 g& k
    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian
6 n; c3 G! c0 ~7 I5 Qrespondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by6 o7 N  D+ K& K( }2 W. |
commercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land
, G. S1 \6 D* ~9 pdevelopment. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country
0 Q4 j5 k% ]  ?- l# S  Kespecially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating1 S0 r" y3 \/ i7 r# c
development prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The; I' L: H& V! b: m- Q- E
residential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to2 ?% q+ Z- K' M, \; [) C
take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and
; e+ c. `! T! n  N8 x4 a$ R) ^6 xsingle-family housing looks overpriced.0 d" Y. v+ j9 \
    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
2 L  n  G& a' ktenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian
7 D/ x  }( h% A% @# ]2 J7 hmetropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push
( n  R; O) m0 b) vhigher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting( H, m# l% O: z# y
new development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,
7 Y0 R) v/ @+ T9 uand most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental4 U  ~) g# |5 B4 f( |( |
apartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary7 G+ H; ~% F, J0 a/ W, C$ l& y
western cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing
9 L4 g7 M; R6 ~7 Q/ s. g; ]' Rshortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into* }+ e: z( R. g! ~! h! Q& K
the energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development% c7 @) ~. Z3 ^
in other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.4 e$ ^0 q) _% v3 x8 B8 r

: g  k, h2 M& C0 _    Canadian Markets to Watch
. O. a; N$ J  P. X+ P6 K: m. x+ ?. T
    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central3 A% {5 i& J( \0 L; D$ A
cities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour( K. f$ Q" O0 ]; b& M
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back1 I* R4 q& s; D" }+ y  A# Z0 l- J
into the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in
1 J: a3 I- v$ V: @5 Zdowntown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical
! s7 N4 }0 F5 y+ }( J2 v5 Yprojects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out
  M( Y0 h, a+ Q0 E" Bwest - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment
: W6 a' a* ]/ ^prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain
2 |) p7 w% z+ [* K. O5 `whether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.
! g3 Q, }* y4 dToronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high  p. C: q, ]6 O6 H3 a. s
ratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.
! O7 S  a5 _, ~7 z" X* `! R& d& ~
0 `5 N! _6 A) h( Z8 B    Calgary/Edmonton
9 }- a) |9 W8 I1 E' V! }  n- ^( }2 Y% @! d2 S
    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one4 U$ p% V& z) Q0 ?3 ~, g
boomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a
9 D* A+ _& O& h: ubuy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,: Q; }& {. |8 v+ [: V7 e  `
48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.# }; l( g( g, \5 g2 y2 d2 H
Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale2 E7 e9 L7 x8 ~7 u- b5 c
Homebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the
! l4 g# C7 l( ~( l0 ECalgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays- x  y. i  V; j  k
strong, this market will continue to do well.7 d' h4 Y" }1 h6 Y$ U
1 H8 ~6 c" N  |3 ?
    Vancouver
3 G6 G& e8 `2 r& A& X$ F4 S7 r" l+ O1 |+ d* V
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is. W: ?. ?( s9 F9 l1 R0 W9 P
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous! G6 n3 ^; n- D) Y0 K+ r
real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the
, h! [! a/ N! U& lmarket is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
/ s4 Q/ \( k  \' f  ygrowth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy, r0 }, T" X) P7 N
recommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%! E7 e/ }1 G  H; G/ k" @: a
for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%9 [( ?- m3 c& N# \" m9 e
for Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very
8 M( \" e  J# R5 [- J/ \good mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.
' p# P, U9 ^- h- v! }/ d$ ~8 W6 e! X1 }: K
    Toronto, I; j7 B0 y/ \, U; d

* F& s6 w2 B1 l3 |  Y% P7 m5 E    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and7 O: c8 Y8 ]! M9 A( b) A- ?: b
manufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is( h# B4 j2 j2 h- W
relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing7 j  h! M! e$ R- M# J
industries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.
, x% ^# Y% }" ~' `' ~' CThree new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square
/ x3 j1 o3 `2 Q8 Gfeet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and' n; I3 L' K7 f3 N/ ~* L
Apartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.1 a$ ]" C$ J. U) i% C( D

7 \( U4 d- r* V5 X! i    Montreal
) [) X3 A7 V% v1 V8 |; E& Q0 P% j3 U
    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall" j; f% r: I. s' y1 i' M
growth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
6 h3 w) n% V% L7 L; l/ Z+ sshop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in; y# J8 I  f6 p
Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate0 C, z2 L1 P% K) N: U! q$ p
sectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors' g- s( Q5 t8 A" l4 e
higher as a "hold" recommendation.
/ N: P9 P6 m7 i$ G) G- B
  Y: ~" z) v# v+ O; `    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
' y% S. y8 f; ]) @6 Qinclude a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy  |3 I% t* u+ }- }4 n( E* e
markets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos
" {" J2 m" ?2 _" N; [) Lnear subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest
/ v" Y+ @, P4 u8 k  Uoverseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current- l1 Y/ }" j- [* g/ z% s! o
prices."
5 w1 b- j2 a- S' g0 P7 N    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at% r8 y. ~0 `0 v
www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.
$ s  @* {  E# ]4 n* p/ j" ?) n2 {/ J- ?" m5 _( Y( O6 ]( r: i. M
    About PricewaterhouseCoopers. Y, A( h9 l. i4 B$ C9 \
2 _" Y. T4 ]" X9 Y7 b
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,, h) Q% L9 x2 n7 A. \) B
tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its
2 f9 x6 c+ P' n" d3 ^( Q# t3 z1 Aclients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries
' _9 w; Y5 U* [5 X/ D, j) v) U! `+ aacross our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop, a7 w  @- h& Y, o
fresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of5 ]' z7 `. T4 b0 U& r
excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
5 g( D* t7 N1 B8 g9 r) yrelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the) u; X5 u+ y1 l& p; \
country.
! R. C6 h; R  B2 O    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario
; y. s# F$ \; V. Klimited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
) i0 ?5 a, P! P  }, m5 \; t8 UPricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
3 ~. V( h+ q2 \, \( d& Meach of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
$ I0 Z; T# S" z/ L5 R9 m) W+ `, N: o
    About the Urban Land Institute
  x0 v' K% F* B- G& l) N3 }; g# ^2 J: x3 ?
    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and
+ \' T6 j# A' e" B9 R" ?0 O# uresearch institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide$ H, ^8 ^0 o: ~6 F
leadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating
( S: p* Z: I1 o, r* L, }thriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more% Z& P) B! M+ d; u( Z, g/ f5 h$ g
than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
  T- f$ p. ^$ Y/ P( I$ U' E, q$ A& adisciplines.
  G3 S& ]$ Z2 W$ v( h    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.# Z. `* H( y  T) H/ V- `
With nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District
6 ?4 q: A! P& l5 S! CCouncil was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is
. ]( z2 B1 g# P  Ynow being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
% c( x: K5 }$ O; k" Phosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,
: v. H& q* \1 x  b& a  @$ o2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake
- @% W! X0 R# q$ p' z# U, D, [Hutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,$ I# o, O/ U' w  p: _; J# V6 [
President of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please
0 n/ p) W; A# u" S1 W/ C) X' Hcall the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on6 e; R1 |9 F9 i
the web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.: I; [: o) U  R8 @' A+ |4 p5 d
2 K( v3 V/ @& S3 p  F

( V. X3 Y' r1 E( m) r4 f
5 Z+ n( _8 E) \For further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,/ s9 k  A7 {, q# k% z2 A" k
(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com
0 E" t% _+ ^( Uhttp://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html
9 @1 [3 B# p+ _5 r; n( O2 Q  p& m9 T- R  Q' Z5 S
[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说:
( O! V' V0 c  @, [- G! C4 R, K  q$ G
尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观# d% i& ^0 |+ S. o% b
    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
, R" x3 g9 n2 X0 ?" k商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。 1 }, ?1 @6 e9 }# k
由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴4 W3 R5 r6 f9 Y% `; F
趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会) " [, B, W- P0 e
和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多
& ~2 G0 f1 y" X9 f0 ~: h- d乐观。
, P, R2 m7 X6 ?& R1 ]  {5 H    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的
5 q3 w* `) k6 K$ y" H年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了+ V' l, e/ _: h4 H8 E) A# B  q
访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
/ K# d$ O- s2 g, z' `- M8 C/ G地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司6 T" w! U" ^9 G) w0 Q
代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。 , i' M% V( P0 t; n  U/ I% d
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷
$ X- I' u2 y! _% }包括亚太地区和欧洲。
" r& `; W, x/ I# h    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大" n1 r0 G3 g3 `% L6 g" b* R$ W
房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资" Y% f" a! S) _
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎9 A: i) B( w+ l5 @) g* q
可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录
) c9 {/ P% j& u2 i& I. `+ G高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 ' U& O0 P! T7 o
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
8 W, I& r& g" ?0 V2 ^7 e0 E, ]! `1 c边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏' X" i- @7 S0 j& p
炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
- x! j9 @! m( W' v4 S, I' F继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国+ ~( J. N  k7 K  J; P; A, I" ~4 y
更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将
" y& C9 {1 \% A( C" ?/ X3 Y非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 ( F8 R! Z, m0 Q
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大
; D: Q1 \1 x& Y  [6 {* Q, N受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是9 b5 j: i; V6 c' b1 |7 \$ b6 t
商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地
. k! A! c0 N& d0 I9 G4 i8 x的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行3 n1 U4 m" u3 d6 a9 r  y  f& T! q6 e
尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明
7 a4 X; U1 x2 j' e: ^0 [! X( J的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该/ _- g& v  N  o; Z, N$ B
住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要' c9 r7 S+ p5 X
以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和
) @- J% k; @( \" y$ G单个家庭的房屋期待过高。
# d& ?# L0 k, i3 D2 c) ^    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了; ]/ }4 A( O/ A5 c
租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大
: Z6 _9 S7 {' ^大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动. y$ Y" P" }$ k0 e8 {: H$ }% P
更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制
8 D8 r+ R( S; _8 b2 w9 Z新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚,
2 C; p$ f, ?, Q0 z/ a& Q: O9 y和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租2 m  W" D. Y- u/ @
公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学
8 H) u, ]  R- S6 H. }! s5 \西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋
2 B1 H: R- {, i9 U/ e$ x* p短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入
1 F( E0 c- f/ I5 K$ e, \能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展: }, m5 X. }, j
在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。
! r0 N# x- W0 ~, I2 B
. M, a2 z+ w; P! `( `, y    加拿大市场上观看
: @$ |' b0 Y: k) J0 I6 u( `
/ k1 o( V3 V3 \- c    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
0 L7 X8 W& f! q# E6 S1 J城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时
/ u5 }/ O) r  K) K, h居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回
( X' P6 D7 S, i8 C) A进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在
1 \* q4 p, \$ [! N$ L0 L市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直8 p/ Y( b, |4 M$ }' j- `
项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市& T" v! R' F& i4 q
西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资
3 v5 x1 \% @% H8 d前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定
) {( Q- d( U6 s1 i' V% d( E是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 2 |+ O6 ~; l( S( S! H, U% i
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
6 R7 `! d6 x) L& N评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。
& c) \5 P+ _; v* u( t/ G0 g
7 E0 _1 x  |: h    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿9 ?$ e& Q* B4 T& ^( e- M
% m! P3 n* K* b  K1 c' n: j
    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号1 U; V! u* n" y+ K8 u7 q) ^
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作
! l0 Q5 g) ?. y- J) r" v购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送,
5 V+ V4 i; T* L' O% e( o; G48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 $ ?, C) m- x( y" ]8 B, A' Z5 c
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后7 h. K* P8 a4 W5 N4 {
住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
* Y  F  w2 z$ S8 s卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留
4 n$ ^5 ^( K- h7 U8 a强大的,这个市场将继续向好。 ) T, {# Z# x! p* w( m0 b5 i

1 a% W# y' o8 q4 I, p    温哥华- n7 E- e6 B5 k( x

# e: }$ |; o; _0 t; T- J# \  X6 l- x# @    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业6 y( T. p9 G4 `: \! ~8 @' o
红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理( `* ^+ A7 [* t" ^8 b9 K4 y
房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和
, l+ ]9 o% w3 Q5 C市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个
( Z& y  n8 x) G: \, {2 k& g主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进2 T/ L+ }' x3 n  N- F: c, E9 W9 z
建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 % & L! R9 f3 _) w3 b& k0 k  c
工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 % : x% e; _9 q* N9 n
为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很3 t2 [" O$ K7 M6 s, B) h& n
良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。 # f) F- Z6 t  l: p

! K( s/ {# Y/ `+ I) U    多伦多
3 h3 A4 n* N4 ]: t, ^0 m/ t3 j' M7 `1 L; Q& j' e8 |/ P- Q  N
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市,
: t1 f& z( ^  X9 t! X/ E5 y制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正/ O0 b# w+ e4 J: A( a
价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造
. z( ]% A8 {+ o% j: @% P工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。 4 \1 `2 g" E. R
三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场9 `# O4 ?' D. N5 J1 M! T, R
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和6 F8 F& k6 @! O$ Z2 k. q; v+ Z
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。 * z; |* V" u7 T7 v9 u  n

+ {7 k- n  N' _& x    蒙特利尔
6 O/ D8 D) u+ c+ l3 w0 B
  v: T3 ~9 ~$ a5 l& V    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体0 `4 n% b4 i) E- Y5 x
经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立* l# W5 g& X. ~$ j
店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市6 O2 i2 R- c2 F. r) p% ~# y
加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产
2 [5 @- w9 f( @6 v0 z; P: |- l+ ~; Z# y部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业+ t" C9 |; A& [2 C1 O' t
高为"持有"建议。 # [: w* H0 n- B, _* s. t

/ S4 d  M: o; @- K* y- R    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年1 c+ B: {8 x( _/ c$ d) p
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源0 J3 A; X9 N4 @' M4 x- q
市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓
+ z* V4 B/ _* W- M/ A附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资4 n7 h/ P- ^* x$ \
海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的
, e* w4 Y5 |1 M价格" 。
5 {+ b0 b1 G" ~7 O  r; m    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
2 {9 X; c; s* {* |, wwww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 % s/ ]) U, \% z& C" f, U+ q

8 u3 \/ ^& r0 ?% ?# {4 R2 I! [    约罗兵咸永道
- X! r- j! k5 f0 U- f
, ?2 t9 F1 e% Q8 S3 h    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证, 5 z1 _' W% J1 l- [
税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值! C. ~6 \# t" D7 }  M% W
客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家9 i( V, ~$ ~  u" x; B- |
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发
& ^1 T9 ?% N: _7 Y( [4 b新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的! N+ i/ H0 ?8 ?& Q3 |( h$ M
卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其
2 y) V# q0 U. j' U/ C4 n相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
, K; J8 B9 s6 ]  }. B国。 + w9 ^) o) i6 t
     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略
2 x/ x4 R) Q; T8 w0 w有限责任合伙,或视情况需要,
  S4 _2 L0 F0 W0 Q普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络, : H+ }! a5 p+ V  A
每年这是一个独立的法律实体。
/ Y( }& l& z: V& d8 ?, p
6 g7 {7 g% B: k+ m3 Y6 x2 e0 x    关于城市土地研究所所长
- e' J  n9 H) m4 J5 {5 c% A+ e8 Q
  H' |' t& ]2 b) V0 e    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和6 Q. R2 Z1 U7 b* A( J' o
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供3 ?( }8 f/ ~4 a" Q
领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造
4 D' E: _. Z5 G, Q$ F% U. z蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更- p/ R. y3 r; b$ ]
超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展
6 i/ _1 |/ ^6 x7 @3 H学科。 ; v9 c( y0 C, G
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 " z8 }3 A8 B! ^4 P
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区
5 W( l+ a" q  V0 G2 F2 a4 g理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会1 G' F9 {1 k1 S. E+ c3 g2 _% s, s
现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会" z+ F% }! X3 g: G9 H/ P. r% [
主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, " w+ d) p' j7 g. }7 B6 o; {
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力
3 f* H0 Z! N: }+ \资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , 5 F$ R/ [; a  P' x: [5 G
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请% {: b# C) H4 W: a7 h9 s: N
致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
1 f2 B$ Q% [0 G+ N6 I网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066
' U. G4 ]8 A1 R) `
6 `" ]) ]" d' J: K' Y7 v) p
1 z2 |: s* C2 a7 k3 [
6 `3 p; H1 \( J9 |0 _$ u- i更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园, 6 {0 C5 r" _7 K: ?6 D
( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层

1 A5 L# m' v8 z7 x. t1 V* I9 p9 s  T$ x' d' M6 T
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!

9 c0 C, ^. }2 e, Bu
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-10 11:39 , Processed in 0.212123 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表